Integrating Technology to Foster Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education Courses: A Survey-Based Study of Lecturers Perceptions

Authors

  • Gunawan English Education Department Universitas Muhammadiyah Bone
  • Sahril English Education Department Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Amirullah Abduh English Education Department Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Samtidar English Education Department Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51454/decode.v6i1.1497

Keywords:

Critical Thinking Skills, Higher Education Courses, Lecturer Perceptions, Survey Research, Technology

Abstract

This study examines lecturers’ perceptions of technology integration in fostering students’ critical thinking skills in higher education. Employing a quantitative approach with a survey research design, data were collected from 62 lecturers across various academic disciplines at Universitas Muhammadiyah Bone, Indonesia. A structured Likert-scale questionnaire was used to capture lecturers’ perceptions across three dimensions: personal attitudes, pedagogical understanding, and teaching experience related to technology-supported critical thinking instruction. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, with the aid of SPSS for windows (IBSM SPSS statistic 28.0). The findings indicate that lecturers generally demonstrate positive attitudes and high awareness regarding the importance of critical thinking as a core learning outcome in higher education, and they perceive technology as a valuable pedagogical tool for supporting analysis, evaluation, evidence-based argumentation, and metacognitive reflection. Lecturers also reported a relatively strong conceptual understanding of critical thinking frameworks and technology integration principles. However, the results reveal a noticeable gap between lecturers’ perceived readiness and the consistent implementation of complex, technology-based argumentative learning practices. Additionally, perceived challenges related to infrastructure limitations, institutional support, and pedagogical training were identified. This study highlights the need for structured instructional design frameworks and sustained institutional support to translate positive perceptions into effective pedagogical practice. The findings contribute insight into lecturers’ perceptions and inform future efforts to enhance technology-supported critical thinking in higher education.

References

Abdurrahman, A., Maulina, H., Nurulsari, N., Sukamto, I., Umam, A. N., & Mulyana, K. M. (2023). Impacts Of Integrating Engineering Design Process Into STEM Makerspace On Renewable Energy Unit To Foster Students’ System Thinking Skills. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15100

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills And Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis. Review Of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102-1134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084

Arviani, F. P., Wahyudin, D., & Dewi, L. (2023). Role of Teaching Strategies in Promoting Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills and Critical Thinking Dispositions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.19

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H Freeman and Company New York

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. University of Alberta, Canada

Darwin, D., Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical Thinking In The AI Era: An Exploration Of EFL Students’ Perceptions, Benefits, And Limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342

Dori, Y. J., & Lavi, R. (2023). Teaching and Assessing Thinking Skills and Applying Educational Technologies in Higher Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10072-x

Dornyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. Routledge.

Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework For Any Discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160-166.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(1), 1–18.

Facione, P. (1990). Critical Thinking : A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction Executive Summary “ The Delphi Report. The California Academic Press, 423, 1-21.

Gelder, T. V. (2005). Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons From Cognitive Science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.41-48

Humphreys, W. L., & Brookfield, S. D. (1989). Developing Critical Thinkers: Challenging Adults to Explore Alternative Ways of Thinking and Acting. Teaching Sociology, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1317962

Indrasiene, V., Jegeleviciene, V., Merfeldaite, O., Penkauskiene, D., Pivoriene, J., Railiene, A., Sadauskas, J., & Valaviciene, N. (2021). The Interaction Between Understanding of Critical Thinking and Teaching/Learning of Critical Thinking Skills. Pedagogika, 144(4), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.15823/P.2021.144.2

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists. Sage Publications.

Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-Enhanced Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: What Is “Enhanced” and How Do We Know? A Critical Literature Review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge.

Lithoxoidou, A., & Georgiadou, T. (2023). Critical Thinking in Teacher Education: Course Design and Teaching Practicum. Education Sciences, 13(8), 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080837

Lopez, F., Contreras, M., Nussbaum, M., Paredes, R., Gelerstein, D., Alvares, D., & Chiuminatto, P. (2023). Developing Critical Thinking in Technical and Vocational Education and Training. Education Sciences, 13(6), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060590

Mahdi, O. R., Nassar, I. A., & Almuslamani, H. A. I. (2020). The Role Of Using Case Studies Method In Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills In Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(2), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p297

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis, L. (2018). Critical Inquiry Based Learning: A Model Of Learning To Promote Critical Thinking Among Prospective Teachers Of Physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43-56.

Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.

Roblyer, M. S. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching: Transforming Learning Across Disciplines. Pearson.

Rungsawang, S., & Pookcharoen, S. (2023). Exploring EFL University Teachers’ Technology Integration to Promote Thai EFL University Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. English Language Teaching, 16(9), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n9p87

Saleh. (2019). Critical Thinking As A 21st Century Skill: Conceptions, Implementation And Challenges In The Efl Classroom. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2542838

Simpson, A. (1996). Critical questions: Whose questions?. The Reading Teacher, 50(2), 118-127.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Vidergor, H. E. (2023). Teaching Futures Thinking Literacy And Futures Studies In Schools. Futures, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103083

Downloads

Published

2026-03-03

How to Cite

Gunawan, Sahril, Abduh, A., & Samtidar. (2026). Integrating Technology to Foster Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education Courses: A Survey-Based Study of Lecturers Perceptions. Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 6(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.51454/decode.v6i1.1497

Issue

Section

Articles