Keadilan Pemilu Dalam Penanganan Bawaslu Sulawesi Tenggara Laporan Ijazah Palsu Calon Legislatif Kota Kendari

Authors

  • Alasman Mpesau Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Indonesia
  • Ruslan Ruslan STIE 66 Kendari, Indonesia
  • Ayib Rosidin Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51454/jimsh.v8i2.1648

Keywords:

bawaslu sultra, electoral justice, fake diploma

Abstract

This study examines the handling of reports concerning the use of a fake diploma by a legislative candidate in Kendari City by the Election Supervisory Agency of Southeast Sulawesi (Bawaslu Sultra), which concluded that the case did not fulfill the elements of an electoral crime, despite official evidence from the Ministry of Education stating that the reported individual was not registered as a National Examination participant. This finding contrasts with the investigation conducted by the Kendari City Police, which designated the reported individual as a suspect in a general criminal offense. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the electoral justice system by Bawaslu Sultra in handling electoral criminal violations and to examine whether the process reflects the principles of electoral justice. This research employs an empirical normative method using statutory, conceptual, and field investigation approaches. The findings indicate that the electoral justice system within Bawaslu Sultra functioned procedurally; however, the outcome did not reflect substantive justice. The dominance of Bawaslu within the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu), without the active involvement of the Police and the Prosecutor’s Office in plenary decision-making, creates potential opportunities for abuse of authority by Bawaslu. Therefore, future enforcement of electoral criminal law should strengthen the role of the Police in investigations through more functional cooperation within Sentra Gakkumdu.

References

Arief, B. N. (2010). Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Penaggulangan Kejahatan Dengan Pidana Penjara. Genta Publishing.

Aziz, R. M. A. (2024). Election Disputes: a Comparative Analysis of the Judicial Review Process in Malaysia and Indonesia. IIUM Law Journal, 32(2), 297–330. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v32i2.946

Bemmelen, J. M. van. (1987). Hukum Pidana1: Hukum Pidana Materil BagianUmum (Diterjemahkan oleh Hasnan). Bina Cipta.

Dagani, G., & Mpesau, A. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Putusan Bawaslu atas Dugaan Penggunaan Ijazah Palsu dalam Pencalonan DPRD Kota Kendari pada Pemilu 2024. 7, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.51454/jimsh.v7i1.1019

Fahmi, K. (2016). Menelusuri Konsep Keadilan Pemilihan Umum Menurut UUD 1945. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 4(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v4i2.4098

Fahmi, K., Amsari, F., Azheri, B., & Kabullah, M. I. (2020). Sistem Keadilan Pemilu dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran dan Sengketa Proses Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(1), 001. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1711

Frankel, M. E. (1993). Criminal Sentence: Law Without Order. Hill and Wang.

Garnett, H. A., & James, T. S. (2023). Electoral backsliding? Democratic divergence and trajectories in the quality of elections worldwide. Electoral Studies, 86(September), 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102696

Gutmann, J., Kantorowicz, J., & Voigt, S. (2025). How do citizens define and value the rule of law? A conjoint experiment in Germany and Poland. Journal of European Public Policy, 32(4), 899–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2326189

Humas DPRD Kota Kendari. (2024). 35 ANGGOTA DPRD KOTA KENDARI MASA JABATAN 2024 – 2029 RESMI DILANTIK. DPRD Kota Kendari. https://dprd-kendari.go.id/2024/08/26/35-anggota-dprd-kota-kendari-masa-jabatan-2024-2029-resmi-dilantik/

James, T. S., & Garnett, H. A. (2023). Are polarised elections the hardest to deliver? Explaining global variations in electoral management body performance. South African Journal of International Affairs, 30(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2271496

James, T. S., & Garnett, H. A. (2024). The Voter Experience Around the World: A Human Reflexivity Approach. Representation, 60(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2023.2290714

Joseph, O., & McLoughlin, F. (2019). Electoral Justice System Assessment Guide. nternational IDEA.

Kendari, K. K. (2023). Pengumuman Pengajuan Bakal Calon Anggota Dprd Kota Kendari Untuk Pemilu 2024. KPU Kota Kendari. https://kota-kendari.kpu.go.id/blog/read/pengumuman-pengajuan-bakal-calon-anggota-dprd-kota-kendari-untuk-pemilu-2024

Kristiyanto, H., Arinanto, S., & Ghafur, H. S. (2023). Institutionalization and party resilience in Indonesian electoral democracy. Heliyon, 9(12), e22919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22919

MD, M. M. (2012). Politik Hukum Di Indonesia. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Mochtar, Z. A. (2025). Guarding Democracy: Judicial Activism in the Indonesian Constitutional Court Decisions in Regional Head Electoral Disputes. Constitutional Review, 11(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1112

Moeljatno. (2008). Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana (Edisi Revi). Rineka Cipta.

Mpesau, A. (2021). Kewenangan Badan Pengawas Pemilu Dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran Administrasi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Indonesia. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 2(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v2i2.16207

Mpesau, A. (2025). Keadilan Hukum Atas Pemberian Amnesti Dan Abolisi Terhadap Terpidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Legal Advice Journal Of Law, 2(4), 18–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51454/paazgw59

Mpesau, A., & Ruslan. (2026). Implications Of The Constitutional Court’s Decision On The Separation Of National And Local Elections For Indonesian Election Law POLITICS. Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI), 6(3), 3375–3382. https://doi.org/https://radjapublika.com/index.php/MORFAI/article/view/5171

O.S, E. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahya Atma Pustaka.

Orozco, J., & Henríquez. (2010). Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm Idea Group.

Ratcliffe, R., & Hariandja, R. (2024). Free coffee and pouring rain: Indonesians vote in world’s biggest one-day election. Support the Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/14/indonesians-vote-in-worlds-biggest-one-day-election

Rawls, J. (1995). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Schaffmeister, D., Keijzer, N., & Sutorius, M. E. P. (1995). Hukum Pidana diterjemahkan Oleh J.E. Sahetapy. Liberty.

Sudarmanto, K., Arifin, Z., Ratuningnagari, A. M., Kusudarmanto, A., & Jain, V. (2025). Electoral Law Reform from the Perspective of Responsive Justice : A Comparison of Renaissance Law College , Indore District , Madhya Pradesh , A . Introduction General elections are a fundamental instrument in democracy , where. Jambe Law Journal, 8(1), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.8.1.315-346

Suhariyanto, D., Ishwara, A. S. S., & Kirana, S. D. (2024). Enforcement of the Code of Ethics for 2024 Election Organizers in Indonesia: A Substantive Justice Perspective. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(2), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i2.1441

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Mpesau, A., Ruslan, R., & Rosidin, A. (2026). Keadilan Pemilu Dalam Penanganan Bawaslu Sulawesi Tenggara Laporan Ijazah Palsu Calon Legislatif Kota Kendari. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH), 8(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.51454/jimsh.v8i2.1648