Exploring the Role of Principal Leadership in Enhancing School Quality: Insights from “Sengkang”

Authors

  • Rahmat Said Educational Administration, Universitas of Puangrimaggalatung, Indonesia
  • Lukman Lukman Educational Administration, Universitas of Puangrimaggalatung, Indonesia
  • Sutrisman Sutriman Educational Administration, Universitas of Puangrimaggalatung, Indonesia
  • Ambo Upe Educational Administration, Universitas of Puangrimaggalatung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51454/jlmpedu.v2i1.767

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of democratic leadership on school quality at UPTD SMP Negeri 6 Sengkang. Using a qualitative approach, including interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis, the research reveals that the principal’s democratic leadership style significantly enhances school adaptability and development. The principal’s collaborative decision-making and inclusive environment have led to notable improvements in school quality, especially during the challenges of COVID-19. Key findings include increased student enrollment, improved school reputation, and effective management practices. The principal’s clear vision, strong work ethic, and focus on a student-centered approach, alongside teacher professional development and a dynamic curriculum, have been essential in achieving educational goals. The study underscores the importance of democratic leadership in fostering a positive school culture and driving continuous improvement, highlighting the interplay between leadership style and effective school management in promoting educational success.

References

Al-Ajeely, S. A., Alkhawaldeh, M. A., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2023). Developing curricula standards in general education in the light of international standards. Migration Letters, 20(S3), 1090-1104.

Anwar, S. (2011). Business research methodology. Salemba Empat.

Aprilianto, A., Sirojuddin, A., & Afif, A. (2021). School principal management strategies for improving student learning achievement. FATAWA: Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.37812/fatawa.v2i1.392

Atasoy, R. (2020). The relationship between school principals' leadership styles, school culture and organizational change. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), 256-274.

Azkiyah, Z., Kartiko, A., & Zuana, M. M. (2020). The influence of the quality of academic services and promotion on the interest of new students in Madrasah. Nidhomul Haq: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v5i2.538

Bush, T., & Marianne, C. (2000). Leadership and strategic management in education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

Cox, J. S., & Mullen, C. A. (2023). Impacting student achievement: Principals’ instructional leadership practice in two Title I rural schools. Journal of School Leadership, 33(1), 3-25.

Darmadi, H. (2014). Educational and social research methods. Bandung: Alphabeta.

Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. (2004). AL-QURAN Dan Terjemahnya. Jakarta: CV Karya Indonesia KARINDO.

Ekosiswoyo, R. (2003). Pengaruh pemberdayaan, kepemimpinan, dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja guru sekolah menengah kejuruan di Jawa Tengah. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: PPS UPI Bandung.

Fleet, D. D. V. (1988). Management. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Gümüş, S., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2020). The relationship between professional development and school principals’ leadership practices: The mediating role of self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(7), 1155-1170.

Hendyat Soetopo. (2012). Organizational behavior theory and practice in the education sector. PT Teen Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Huang, S. Y., Li, M. W., & Chang, T. W. (2021). Transformational leadership, ethical leadership, and participative leadership in predicting counterproductive work behaviors: Evidence from financial technology firms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 658727.

Joremo, A. S. (2005). Quality based education, formulation principles and implementation procedures. Jakarta: RieneCipta.

Marisya, F., Mayasari, V., Astuti, S. D., & Purwanto, M. B. (2023). Implementation of leadership ethics and transformational leadership in employee performance. Asian Journal of Applied Business and Management, 2(4), 545-556.

Meyer, A., Kleinknecht, M., & Richter, D. (2023). What makes online professional development effective? The effect of quality characteristics on teachers’ satisfaction and changes in their professional practices. Computers & Education, 200, 104805.

Mulyadi, M. (2016). Practical research methods: Qualitative and quantitative. Jakarta: Public Press.

Nauman, S., Bhatti, S. H., Imam, H., & Khan, M. S. (2022). How servant leadership drives project team performance through collaborative culture and knowledge sharing. Project Management Journal, 53(1), 17-32.

Nedelko, Z., & Potocan, V. (2021). Sustainability of organizations: The contribution of personal values to democratic leadership behavior focused on the sustainability of organizations. Sustainability, 13(8), 4207.

Nur Efendi. (2015). Islamic educational leadership: Understanding the integration of leadership concepts in Islamic educational institutions. Kalimedia, Yogyakarta.

Priansa, D. J., & Somad, R. (2014). School principal supervision and leadership management. Bandung: Alphabeta.

Priansa, D. J. (2014). Teacher performance and professionalism. Bandung: Alphabeta.

Samuelsson, J., Melin, Å., Olin-Scheller, C., & Gericke, N. (2024). Between democratic ideals and local conditions: Elementary school teachers’ narratives of progressive teaching in Sweden in the 1940s. Paedagogica Historica, 60(3), 389-413

Stroebe, W. (2020). Student evaluations of teaching encourages poor teaching and contributes to grade inflation: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 42(4), 276-294.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-08

How to Cite

Said, R., Lukman, L., Sutriman, S., & Upe, A. (2024). Exploring the Role of Principal Leadership in Enhancing School Quality: Insights from “Sengkang”. Journal of Leadership, Management and Policy in Education, 2(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.51454/jlmpedu.v2i1.767