Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Bawaslu sebagai Lembaga Pengawas dan Lembaga Pemutus Sengketa Pemilihan Umum
Keywords:
adjudication agency, Bawaslu, prevention, quasi judiciaryAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of the authority of the Bawaslu as an election supervisory institution and election process dispute resolution. This research is a normative legal research by examining all laws and regulations related to the legal issues being studied. The research approach uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, namely legal materials that are authoritative in nature, which consist of statutory regulations, official records, or treatises in making statutory regulations as well as secondary legal materials (materials that provide explanations regarding primary legal materials, including , documents, books, magazines, legal journals and research reports related to this research). The conclusion of this research has been obtained that First, Bawaslu as an election supervisory institution performs the function of preventing violations. Second, the Authority to Resolve Election Process Disputes of the Bawaslu is an attributive authority based on Law no. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections in Article 94 paragraph (3) point d and Bawaslu Members have met the criteria as judges at the Bawaslu Adjudication Session because they have gone through such a strict selection process in accordance with the stages they have carried out and the Selection Team has conducted an assessment based on the criteria contained in article 117 of the Election Law. Third, Article 469 which states that the Bawaslu decision is final and binding is a sentence that gives position or power to the Bawaslu adjudication decision which is final. However, this power is immediately removed in the next phrase which gives exceptions to certain circumstances.References
Abidin, Y. B., Sensu, L., & Tatawu, G. (2020). Pelaksanaan Konstitusional Kewenangan Bawaslu sebagai Pengawas Pemilu dan Mengadili Sengketa Proses Pemilu. Jurnal HaluOleo Legal Research, 2(2), 95–107.
Abustan, A. (2017). Penataan Lembaga Negara Refleksi Penguatan Sistem Presidensial. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 9(2), 195-214.
Adi Sulistiyono, S. H. (2018). Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Prenada Media.
Afifuddin, M. (2020). Membumikan Pengawasan Pemilu: Mozaik Pandangan dan Catatan Kritis dari Dalam. Elex Media Komputindo.
Amal, B. (2019). Kewenangan Mengadili oleh BAWASLU atas sengketa proses pemilu yang diatur dalam peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 48(3), 306-311.
Anwar, H. A. (2019). Peran Bawaslu dalam Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Pemilu. Voice Justisia, 3(2).
Eki Baihaki, Peran Bawaslu dan Pemilu yang Berintegritas, Kompas https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/ 03/13/08160081/peran-bawaslu-dan-pemilu-yang-berintegritas, diakes pada tanggal 11 September 2018.
Esfandiari, F., & Fatih, S. Al. (2020). Initiating a Permanent Electoral Body To Resolve Dignified Election Disputes: Assessing the Effectiveness of Gakkumdu. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 9(3), 333. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.44437
Harahap, P. A., Siregar, G. T., & Siregar, S. A. (2021). Peran Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara (Polda-Su) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Retentum, 2(1), 90-98.
Indra Rahmatullah,” Rejuvinasi Sistem Check and Balances Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan
di Indonesia”, Jurnal Cita Hukum, 2013, hlm. 216
Jazuly, S. (2015). Independent Agencies dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 4(1).
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, (Jakarta: Sekertariat Jendral Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2006), hlm, 119
Librayanto, R. (2008). Trias Politica dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan. Makassar: Pukap.
Perludem NIlai Kewenangan Bawaslu Terlalu Besar, Detik < https://news.detik.com/berita/d-
/perludem-nilai-kewenangan-bawaslu-terlalu-besar>, diakes pada tanggal 10 September 2018.
Pratama, R. A. (2019). Upaya Bawaslu Kota Samarinda Dalam Pencegahan Pelanggaran Pemilu Anggota Legislatif Serta Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Tahun 2019. Journal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(3), 1311-1324.
Ramadlan, M. F. S., & Wahyudi, T. H. (2016). Pembiaran Pada Potensi Konflik dan Kontestasi Semu Pemilukada Kota Blitar: Analisis Institusionalisme Pilihan Rasional. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 1(2), 136-153.
Ramlan Surbakti dan Hari Fitrianto, Transformasi Bawaslu dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengawasan Pemilu, (Jakarta: Kemitraan Bagi Pembaharuan Tata Pemerintahan, 2015), hlm. 18.
Siregar, A. A. (2019). Bawaslu Ajudication Authorithy And It’s Implementation in The Regions. Lampung.
Sitepu, P. A. (2010). Negara dan Masyarakat Sipil dalam Perspektif Sejarah Politik Indonesia. Jurnal POLITEIA| Vol, 2(1).
Von Bóné, E. (2019). The Influence of the trias politica of Montesquieu on the first Dutch Constitution. In Comparative Law(pp. 111-121). Routledge.
Yani, A. (2018). Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia: Pendekatan Teori dan Praktek Konstitusi Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 12(2), 119.
Zainal Arifin Mochtar, Lembaga Negara Independen : Dinamika Perkembangan dan Penataannya Kembali Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi, (Depok : RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016), hlm. Vii-ix
Zulfan, Z. (2018). Analisis Pengaturan dan Praktik Pemisahan Kekuasaan Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial Berdasarkan Konstitusi. Jurnal Media Hukum, 25(1), 60-67.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
