STAD atau Jigsaw? Menguji Keefektifan Dua Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dalam PKn
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51454/jimsh.v6i2.775Keywords:
Civics Learning Outcomes, Cooperative Learning Models, Jigsaw, STADAbstract
This study aims to determine the differences in Civic Education learning outcomes between students taught using the STAD cooperative learning model and the Jigsaw cooperative learning model at MAN 1 Kendari. The research method used is an experimental design with a post-test only control group design. The sample consists of 60 students, selected through multi-stage random sampling, with 30 students from class XI IPS2 and 30 students from class XI IPS3. Data were collected using a Civic Education learning outcomes test, which was validated and tested for reliability, with a reliability score of 0.903. The results showed that the average learning outcomes of students taught with the STAD model were higher (87.21) compared to those taught with the Jigsaw model (73.44). Hypothesis testing revealed a significant difference between the two learning models, with a t-value (30) greater than the t-table value (2.390) at a 0.01 significance level. This study concludes that the STAD cooperative learning model is more effective in improving Civic Education learning outcomes compared to the Jigsaw learning model.
References
Aporbo, R. J. (2023). Impact of cooperative learning strategy on students’ academic productivity. Journal of Student and Education (JSE), 1(1). Retrieved from https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/jse and https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370410633
Azwar, M., Anwar, Y. A., Maria, & Khairani. (2022). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan pendekatan SAVI dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar PPKn. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 7433-7445. Retrieved from https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu
Buchs, C., & Maradan, M. (2021). Fostering equity in a multicultural and multilingual classroom through cooperative learning. Intercultural Education, 32(4), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2021.1889985
Eslit, E. R. (2023). The effects of cooperative learning on student achievement: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370401155
Emildadiany, N. (2008). Cooperative learning-teknik jigsaw. Retrieved from http://akhmadsudrajat.wordpress.com
Fitriana, D. E. N., Yanti, D. K., Yunus, A. K., & Aprilya, R. E. (2022). Analysis of learning difficulties of class XII high school students on genetic material. International Journal of Biology Education Towards Sustainable Development, 2(2), 71-78.
Gul, F. F., & Shehzad, S. (2015). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 9(3), 246-255. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.2071
Iba, L. (2010). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD terhadap hasil belajar sosiologi (Unpublished master's thesis). Pascasarjana Unhalu, Kendari.
Ibrahim, M., dkk. (2000). Pembelajaran kooperatif. Surabaya: Program Pasca Sarjana UNESA.
Isa, I. M. (2021). Effects of Jigsaw IV cooperative learning strategy on students’ academic performance in organic chemistry in Zaria Education Zone, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Chemistry and Materials Research, 11(9). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356540869
Isjoni. (2007). Cooperative learning (Mengembangkan kemampuan belajar kelompok). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Jacobs, G., & Chau, M. H. (2021). Two approaches for promoting student-centered language learning: Cooperative learning and positive psychology. Beyond Words, 9(1), 1-15.
Jainal, N. H., & Shahrill, M. (2021). Incorporating Jigsaw strategy to support students learning through action research. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 3(2), 252-266. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.75 and https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1294421.pdf
Kaanklao, N., & Suwathanpornkul, I. (2020). Development of the learning management process to enhance the chemistry learning achievement and conceptual comprehension on organic chemistry using the Posner’s approach with design-based research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(2), 282-288.
Karali, Y., & Aydemir, H. (2019). The effect of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and attitude of students in mathematics class. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(21), 712-722. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2018.3636
Marni. (2010). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif (Tipe STAD dan Tipe Jigsaw) terhadap hasil belajar sejarah di SMA Negeri 6 Kendari (Unpublished master's thesis). Pascasarjana Unhalu, Kendari.
Mendo-Lázaro, S., León-del-Barco, B., Polo-del-Río, N., & López-Ramos, V. M. (2022). The impact of cooperative learning on university students’ academic goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 787210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787210
Mogelvang, A., & Nylehn, J. (2022). Cooperative learning in undergraduate mathematics and science education: A scoping review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 1935-1959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10331-0
Millis, B. J. (2023). Why faculty should adopt cooperative learning approaches. In Cooperative learning in higher education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003443681-1
Mubayinah, S. (2023). Jigsaw effects on student learning outcomes: A review. Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy, 1(3), 193-197. https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v1i03.243
Negash, T. T., Eshete, M. T., & Hanago, G. A. (2022). Students’ learning approaches as a factor of academic achievement at selected public universities: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Education, 7, 965573. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.965573
Nurhadi. (2004). Pendekatan kontekstual (Contextual teaching and learning). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Osei, J. K., & Appiah-Twumasi, E. (2018). Cooperative learning strategy: Effective student-centered intervention to enhance performance and knowledge retention. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS), 5(5), 151-156.
Ozturk, B. (2023). The effect of cooperative learning models on learning outcomes: A second-order meta-analysis. Educational Policy Analysis & Strategic Research, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.600.13
Rosit, S. M., & Lusie, P. M. F. J. (2023). Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dan Politik (JPKP), 1(1), 1-10.
Rusman. (2010). Model-model pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Safkolam, R., Ahmad Z. E. I., & Sari, I. J. (2023). The effects of Jigsaw technique on learning achievement and retention of science teacher students. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 11(3), 37-42.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sudijono, A. (2009). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo.
Sudjana, N. (1992). Metoda statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Suleiman, M. B., Musa, O. D., & Munir, A. (2021). Effect of Jigsaw II cooperative learning strategy (J2CLS) on academic achievement of senior secondary students in physics within Bauchi metropolis. A paper presented at the 2nd National Conference on: Issues in STEAM Education in the 21st Century.
Tabiolo, J. L., & Rogayan, D. J. (2019). Enhancing students’ science achievement through Jigsaw II strategy. Journal of Science Learning, 3(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i1.17680
Van Ryzin, M. J., Roseth, C. J., & Biglan, A. (2020). Mediators of effects of cooperative learning on prosocial behavior in middle school. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 5, 37-52.
Winslow, M. P. (2020). The Jigsaw classroom: Engaging students with cooperative learning. Encompass. Retrieved from https://encompass.eku.edu/swps_facultygallery/60
Wirasaputra, & Rosita. (1996). Belajar dan pembelajaran. (Modul UT, 1-6). Jakarta: Depdikbud, Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bahartiar Bahartiar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
